Questions and Answers
![]()

Michael Scott is a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, and a child custody mediator. He has been a therapist since 1982 and maintains a private practice in Santa Cruz, CA. Since 1985, Michael has served as a child custody mediator for The County of Santa Cruz Superior Court. He is an educator offering workshops both nationally and internationally on marriage, divorce, parenting, education, personal and professional development, conflict resolution, and the developmental needs of children.
PO Box 822 * Santa Cruz, CA 95061 * (831)423-0521
![]()
                            
![]()
The
                                  following questions, and my responses, were
                                  generated during a presentation given October
                                  26, 2005 to upper division students enrolled
                                  in "Psychology of Trauma" offered at the 
As
                                  a general response to all the questions below
                                  when dealing with symptoms that reportedly
                                  manifest during or following divorce, I
                                  explore the intensity, frequency, and duration
                                  of the symptoms relative to the developmental
                                  needs and the age of a child.
When
                                  facilitating mediation to establish the
                                  parenting plan for a child, consideration
                                  should be given to, a) what the child is
                                  familiar with relative to the parenting
                                  arrangement pre-divorce/separation; or prior
                                  to the couple entering mediation if they had
                                  been divorced/separated for any significant
                                  length of ti
Regardless, whether the couple was ever
                                  together, I want to know the dynamic of the
                                  couple. If the parents are cooperating,
                                  communicating, consistent, and compromising in
                                  a mature manner it will generally be more
                                  supportive of adaptation and minimization of
                                  trauma for the child. Parents lacking these
                                  four qualities or skills, whether having been
                                  together or not, will contribute to the child
                                  experiencing stress from the adult
                                  interaction. Most likely the child will
                                  internalize that stressful experience. All
                                  things being equal, however, if the child's
                                  reality is that his/her parents are a unit and
                                  then there is a divorce, the child will more
                                  likely experience a sense of abandonment and a
                                  greater sense of loss than the child who never
                                  experienced their parents being together.
Research indicates that: a.) Females
                                  tend to adapt more easily and quickly then
                                  males to divorce. There are a number of
                                  possible scenarios. Generally it takes females
                                  about one year and males about two years to
                                  adapt. b.)
                                  Children tend to adapt more readily when their
                                  schedule is consistent and predictable. c.)
                                  The higher the level of tolerance for stress a
                                  child has, the more easily that child tends to
                                  manage and adapt. d.) Children tend to adapt
                                  to a divorce more effectively if parents are
                                  not undermining each other but rather
                                  maintaining a dynamic of cooperation,
                                  communication, consistency, and compromise.
During my professional experience I
                                  have observed that a lack of recall related to
                                  childhood events often times is associated
                                  with two opposing experiences. It is possible
                                  that if events surrounding a divorce were
                                  extremely traumatic, the child may employ an
                                  ego defense mechanism, such as suppression,
                                  repression, minimization, denial, delusion, or
                                  dissociation, in order to cope with the
                                  trauma. A second possibility is that the
                                  parents actually managed the event with
                                  maturity resulting in the child’s trauma
                                  being minimized such that the child adapted
                                  and integrated the situation with minimal
                                  stress. In both scenarios, the adult who was a
                                  child of divorce may not have significant
                                  recall of events from their childhood.
I use two approaches. The first is to
                                  work with both parents and attempt to educate
                                  them as to the impact the behavior is having
                                  on the child (even if only one of the parents
                                  is non-cooperative I will try to meet with
                                  both parents.) If the parents do not want to
                                  work together I seek to work with the parents
                                  individually. I explain to each parent how
                                  that parent can modify their behavior such
                                  that it is supportive of the child. Third, if
                                  the parent who is the “offender”
                                  refuses to participate or “just does not
                                  get it,” I will work with the more
                                  cooperative parent to create what I call an,
                                  “
I am assuming this is in reference to a
                                  situation when the biological father was not
                                  present. Two possibilities I have observed:
                                  One is a significant adult male in the life of
                                  the child is supportive and helpful. This
                                  person can be a relative, a neighbor, a
                                  teacher, etc. Second, from a Jungian
                                  perspective all people have both masculine
                                  (animus) and feminine (anima) traits and
                                  characteristics. If there is no surrogate
                                  available in the child's life to support the
                                  absent mother or father, then it becomes
                                  important for the single parent to be both
                                  mother and father to the child. A single
                                  female parent would have to reflect aspects of
                                  her animus while a single male parent would
                                  have to reflect aspects of his anima. The same
                                  is true in a same gender parenting
                                  relationship.
This is a very difficult question to
                                  answer because it is based on an individual's
                                  response to variable factors in that person's
                                  life and personality. Truthfully this question
                                  can fill at least a quarter semester
                                  discussion. I am not being facetious.
                                  Generally people leave a marriage for relief
                                  from what they consider an intolerable
                                  situation, no longer wanting to live their
                                  life in that manner. The spectrum of
                                  “intolerable” however is based on
                                  the individual definitions I alluded to in the
                                  first sentence of this paragraph.
In my professional opinion it should
                                  always remain the decision of the parents.
                                  However, in adolescence, when a child
                                  manifests abstract reasoning ability, the
                                  child should be given credibility of
                                  preference. Still the decision should remain
                                  with the parents. For the child to have to
                                  choose, s/he is put in a
                                    lose/lose, or untenable situation.
I believe one will get different
                                  answers from various professionals (and
                                  non-professionals) that have addressed this
                                  issue. Again, I do not think there is a single
                                  answer but rather a combination of factors.
                                  Considerations include, but are not limited
                                  to, norms and values of the culture one comes
                                  from and the social structure within which you
                                  live. If one lives in a society where divorce
                                  is easily obtained and the social structure
                                  makes it acceptable, then more likely the
                                  divorce rate will increase. If the couple has
                                  significantly different values, it makes it
                                  more difficult to sustain the marriage over a
                                  longer period of ti
An additional contributing factor, in
                                  my opinion, is that our culture does not
                                  appear to be supportive nor
                                  conducive for marriages to be successful. Our
                                  tax structure penalizes marriage. Consumer
                                  advertising tends to idealize youth, unlimited
                                  options, and disposable commodities. (If you don’t like what you have, go out and get a new one.)
                                  It portrays “desire and wants” as
                                  a viable substitute for “needs. People
                                  often confuse intimacy with intensity. I
                                  observe a lack of maturity in many adults. Our
                                  culture neither supports nor is respectful of
                                  elders who can guide and mentor youth. There
                                  is a lack of ritual transformation into
                                  maturity and a myriad of other factors that
                                  make it difficult for one to find their
                                  “soul” in our society. It is
                                  challenging to identify one's values and hold
                                  on to them when materialism provides so easily
                                  the accessibility to “wants”
                                  promoted as “needs.” 
It is my opinion that many in our
                                  society are at risk for not understanding what
                                  it takes to enter into a lifelong commitment.
                                  It is exacerbated for children of divorce.
                                  There is often a “fear” living
                                  within a child who has come from a family
                                  where divorce has occurred. That fear sounds
                                  like a voice inside that says, “I do not
                                  want to make the same mistakes that my parents
                                  made.” Unfortunately, unless that
                                  individual has processed alternative
                                  behaviors, the fear will only result in
                                  hesitancy rather than understanding that is
                                  required to be in a lifelong mature, healthy,
                                  committed relationship.
At the time of the divorce, research
                                  suggests that there are age specific symptoms.
                                  There are specific symptoms if the divorce
                                  occurs when the child is four years old vs.
                                  eights years old. Wallerstein and Kelly's, Surviving
                                    the Breakup, and Wallerstein's follow-up
                                  work, documents longitudinal observations;
                                  through both research and anecdotal reporting.
                                  Similarly Hetherington, Cox, and Cox did a
                                  study out of the 
Divorce creates stress on all
                                  children. There are multiple and sudden life
                                  changes; school, family, friends, standard of
                                  living, lack of predictability, often times
                                  arguing, anger, fear, and hurt. Frequently the
                                  parents are emotionally unavailable and often
                                  become emotionally dependent on the child
                                  (parentification). The child can believe that
                                  s/he is the cause of the divorce. This results
                                  from the child feeling powerless. If the child
                                  believes s/he is the cause it gives the child
                                  a sense of power. This may well result in an
                                  overburdened child. The child experiences a
                                  sense of abandonment. Their world is disrupted
                                  and “blown apart.” It often feels
                                  like death over and over again. They wonder if
                                  their parent will be at home when they return.
                                  Children are egocentric. They do not
                                  understand it is not about them. As children
                                  of divorce grow into adulthood and enter
                                  relationships, they often fear they will
                                  repeat the “error” their parents
                                  made in not being able to resolve conflicts
                                  that inevitably arise. It is not unusual that
                                  they mistakenly and unconsciously attempt to
                                  work out their parents’ problems in
                                  their own relationship. Unfortunately this
                                  tends to undermine the relationship rather
                                  than contribute to its stability.
Imagine the following: a child of
                                  divorce is living with each parent on an
                                  alternate weekly basis, (I am using this
                                  example for ease of understanding. It can be
                                  any proportional amount of time). When this
                                  child is with "Parent X,", "Parent Y" misses
                                  the child. When the child is with "Parent Y,"
                                  "Parent X" misses the child. Fifty percent of
                                  the time each parent misses the child.
                                  However, 100% of the time the child is missing
                                  one of their parents. There is no relief for
                                  the child. 
The age of the child tends to
                                  influence the specific behavioral reaction.
                                  Regardless of the age however, it is possible
                                  that the child may or may not see the
                                  parent’s behavior as manipulation. If
                                  the child does not experience the behavior as
                                  manipulation, an alliance, or collusion, may
                                  well be established between the manipulating
                                  parent and the child which
                                  may result in keeping the other parent on the
                                  periphery of a relationship with the child. It
                                  may even result in alienation of the
                                  parent-child relationship (with the parent who
                                  is not being manipulative). If the child is
                                  sophisticated and mature enough to experience
                                  the parental behavior as manipulative, the
                                  child's reactions to the manipulation would be
                                  contingent upon the age of that child. In a
                                  very young child it may appear as fear or
                                  crying when scheduled to be with the
                                  manipulative parent (or leaving the parent who
                                  is manipulating). In an adolescent it may
                                  manifest as outright refusal to see the
                                  manipulative parent (or the parent who is not
                                  manipulating). It is not unusual that when a
                                  child matures to adulthood, that individual
                                  (the child who is now the adult) sustains a
                                  relationship with both parents, but is able to
                                  comprehend the manipulation of the immature
                                  parent. The adult child may however, still
                                  experience guilt as a result of the
                                  manipulation since s/he is internally having
                                  the experience of being
                                  “controlled” by one of the
                                  parents. S/he becomes objectively aware that
                                  it is a part of that parent’s
                                  personality. Very often I will have that
                                  person (the adult child) in my therapy
                                  practice dealing with their “post
                                  traumatic stress” feelings resulting
                                  from the manipulation, which impacts their
                                  ability to function in a healthy manner in
                                  their current relationships.
Regarding helping with coping skills:
                                  refer to #3
Once again this is an issue of both
                                  the age of the child and how the parents'
                                  present the rationale of the divorce. On my
                                  website, I have posted an article on my
                                  website by 
Not always, but as we mature, we are
                                  often able to see their experience through our
                                  reality. Generally there is a maturing
                                  perspective the older one becomes. An
                                  individual whose reality is a near replication
                                  of their parents' reality and unable to form a
                                  more sophisticated view of the world will be
                                  limited by their parent(s) perspective.
I do not know the percentage. In my
                                  practice I have come across five
                                  “types” of couples. Four of these
                                  “types” fall within my therapy
                                  practice and one appears in my mediation
                                  practice. 
First are couples who are doing very
                                  well and want to evolve into a
                                  “thriving” relationship. They are
                                  looking for more effective
                                  “tools/skills” to enhance the
                                  sacredness of their marriage.
Second, couples who are realizing they
                                  have problems and are committed to working it
                                  out. They are looking for a new set of
                                  “tools/skills” to enhance their
                                  relationship.
Third, couples who realize they are in
                                  trouble and are trying to figure out if they
                                  actually want to be together.
Fourth, couples who are in trouble and
                                  at least one of the parties has
                                  emotionally left the relationship. That
                                  individual has to articulate it to his or her
                                  partner.
Fifth, couples in child custody
                                  mediation. These couples are finished with
                                  their marriage and now have to deal with how
                                  they will parent their child.
I refer you to my website and the
                                  article by 
See #10
I can only discuss 
If it is just allegations (“he
                                  said, she said”) lacking substantiation,
                                  it generally does not come into play. If there
                                  is substantiation such as a DUI or prior
                                  treatment program involvement, the court can
                                  order “random testing.” In
                                  addition there will more than likely be
                                  restrictions such as no use for twenty-four
                                  hours prior to and during the time the child
                                  is under the responsibility of that parent. If
                                  a “random test” indicates usage
                                  during the “guideline frame” it is
                                  more than likely supervised visitation will be
                                  established by the court pending some type of
                                  intervention through a program to deal with
                                  the substance/alcohol abuse.
Regarding the specificity of a
                                  schedule, I address that in #17.
I am assuming we are not referring to
                                  male or female. :-)
                                  As I indicated earlier, Females tend to adapt
                                  in about a year following the divorce, males
                                  about two years. Females tend to internalize
                                  their experiences (i.e., depression). Males
                                  tend to externalize their experiences (i.e.,
                                  anger). If a divorce occurs when the child is
                                  eight years old and the child is a male, I
                                  would expect certain symptoms (Wallerstein and
                                  Kelly reference above for age specific
                                  symptoms). If I see the child three years
                                  later and the child is manifesting symptoms of
                                  an eleven year old going through the initial
                                  phases of a divorce, I would have concern that
                                  the child is not adapting well to the divorce
                                  of his/her parents. The maturity and the
                                  role-modeling of the parents play a
                                  significant part in how the child, male or
                                  female, manages and adapts to the divorce. 
Age of the child, values of the
                                  family, and reaction of the parents will all
                                  have profound impact. Obviously the older the
                                  child the more that child will grasp the
                                  significance. Do not necessarily think that
                                  the child will have a negative feeling. I have
                                  seen adolescents who have been in such a
                                  situation and were relieved because they
                                  thought the parent who got caught should have
                                  left the marriage a long time ago (and this
                                  can be that the child is happy because they
                                  are siding with the parent who was not having
                                  the affair or they are siding with the parent
                                  who had the affair.) It is not uncommon that
                                  there are multiple issues occurring and a
                                  suspicion that one of the parents has been
                                  having an affair. It is therefore not
                                  necessarily a shock. Emotions range from
                                  anger, to fear, to confusion, to hurt, and to
                                  sha
I have also seen cases with such an
                                  event when deep religious belief is part of
                                  the family system. The child initially is
                                  extremely confused and has a reaction of both
                                  confusion and anger. It is generally based on
                                  betrayal of the value structure established
                                  within the family faith system. The child is
                                  unable to see the humanity of the parent who
                                  broke the vow.
There
                                    is no “best.” The prevailing philosophy is to
                                  take into account the age of the child, the
                                  developmental needs of the child, the status
                                  quo of what has been occurring in the marriage
                                  regarding parenting up until the divorce, and
                                  the availability of the parents' schedules.
                                  Given consideration of the factors identified
                                  above, a schedule that is created will
                                  hopefully have the child's best interest in
                                  perspective. Thus the child should be familiar
                                  with the parenting time frames (percentages)
                                  and hopefully be able to more easily manage
                                  and cope with the divorce of his/her parents.
                                  The schedule can be modified as the child
                                  adapts. Modifications should be implimented
                                  gradually. 
This is an intriguing question. I have
                                  not seen studies reflecting research on this
                                  subject. My opinion is that it is primarily an
                                  issue of parental cooperation and maturity. I
                                  suggest that it is a factor of the age of the
                                  child. If there are siblings, a subsystem may
                                  be helpful if the children get along and are
                                  within 3 to 5 year age range (especially if
                                  they are younger than adolescents.) However, I
                                  have seen children very frequently split their
                                  allegiance to balance out the system. One will
                                  align with mom and the other with dad. Please
                                  be aware, as I indicated in class, all issues
                                  are not just in heterosexual couples. I have
                                  seen this in same gender couples too. It is
                                  also possible that in high conflict divorce, a
                                  sibling subsystem may provide mutual support
                                  in dealing with the immaturity of the parents.
Blending a family is extremely
                                  difficult. Statistically a second marriage
                                  where there are children from a prior
                                  relationship result in approximately a 65%
                                  divorce rate within the first five years.
                                  Third marriages with the same criteria are
                                  likely to end in divorce at a rate ranging
                                  from 70% to 85% within the first five years.
                                  The range is difficult to specify because of
                                  the complicated variables of the individuals
                                  getting remarried and possibly each having
                                  been married different numbers of times. The
                                  statistical percentage of divorce increases as
                                  one remarries more times. When asked what
                                  contributed as the primary reason for the
                                  divorce; overwhelmingly the divorcing parties
                                  indicated that the children from the prior
                                  relationship were the significant factor
                                  contributing to the breakup of the marriage.
Mom's House. Dad's House, by Isolina Ricci, has a
                                  section on how to get an uninvolved parent to
                                  participate.
My personal philosophy is if a parent does not want to participate, and you have attempted unsuccessfully to get that parent involved, then stop trying and tell the truth to the child. The problem is that no child is going to understand why their father or mother does not want to see him or her. I cannot count the many stories I have heard about a child sitting at the window waiting for their parent to show up and s/he never comes. It is painful. I believe you do not tell the child that the other parent is a “jerk.” I believe you tell the truth and that you can't tell them why; it just is that “mom or dad does not come to spend time with you.” It is critical to say to the child that it is not about you (the child). Years later, I will see that child as an adult and deal with it in therapy when they have the ability to grasp an understanding as to what the reasons might be. Those reasons could be that the parent that did not show up was just too immature to deal with the responsibility of having a child, or that the primary parent made it absolutely impossible for the absent parent to participate, or the schedule as ordered by the court was such that it was too painful for the absent parent to maintain an artificial relationship based on the infrequency of seeing the child as ordered.
There are numerous possibilities. As far as impact; If the single parent provides an enriching, supportive environment with surrogate others (male/female), and is able to generate and access the animus if a female and the anima if a male (Jung) then the child will have a nurturing and stimulating experience. If the blended family is a “nightmare“ because the step-parent is doing the role of “parent” rather than being a significant adult in the child's life, there is a possibility that the child will resent that step-parent. If on the other hand, the biological parent is not involved, the step-parent can have a very productive and nurturing role if s/he fully understands the dynamics of blending a family.
Refer to # 4 regarding anima and
                                  animus.
Several factors contribute to a child's
                                  ability to adjust to the schedule: the age of
                                  the child, developmental needs, temperament of
                                  the child, availability of the parents to
                                  implement the schedule effectively, what the
                                  child is familiar with at the time of the
                                  divorce (status quo) regarding the parenting,
                                  and how well both parents support the
                                  parenting plan. Assuming the above criteria is
                                  addressed, and the child is not doing well,
                                  then the first few things I would want to
                                  know: 1) Has the schedule been sustained
                                  consistently; 2) Are the parents undermining
                                  one another (or is one undermining the other);
                                  3) Have there been any significant changes
                                  like a new relationship, a move, a remarriage,
                                  a new child being born in the family. If the
                                  factors listed above are addressed and the
                                  child is not doing well, (whatever that
                                  means), I would want to know, what is the
                                  child not happy about with regard to the
                                  schedule? Depending on the child's age there
                                  will be different symptoms. Depending upon the
                                  child's age different consideration is given
                                  to the child’s credibility to assess
                                  what makes them (un)happy.
                                  As an example, regardless of whether a child
                                  is six or
sixteen
                                  years old, if the reason the child is unhappy
                                  with the schedule is due to the fact that when
                                  s/he is at parent X’s house, that parent
                                  makes them make their bed, I will not give it
                                  much credibility. A child who is an abstract
                                  thinker, (most likely over the age of twelve),
                                  and has the ability to understand the
                                  rationale of their desire to modify their
                                  schedule, should be given more credibility to
                                  preference with regard to modification. If the
                                  child has not demonstrated that level of
                                  development, then credibility of preference is
                                  not strongly taken into account.
It is usually extremely confusing for
                                  the child to have not experienced arguing and
                                  discomfort and then experience his/her parents
                                  getting a divorce. That child will generally
                                  grieve, and not understand the need for the
                                  divorce. It is not uncommon for the child to
                                  feel distrustful and insecure about
                                  relationships and fearful of marriage as an
                                  adult.
I have not seen research on this issue.
                                  It usually shows up not as a birth order
                                  symptom, but rather as an age symptom.
                                  Therefore, if you have two children; a five
                                  year old and a two year old, the child that is
                                  five years old would tend to have symptoms
                                  similar to a child that is five years old and
                                  is an only child. Similarly, the child that is
                                  two years old and a second child in the family
                                  would have similar symptoms to a child that is
                                  two years old and is an only child.
I have not observed any differences.
                                  Nor am I aware of studies that reflect there
                                  are differences.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thank you and please
                                  return.
Copyright ©
                                  Michael Scott, 1996-2022. All rights reserved.
Last updated 04/02/2022
![]()